Efektivitas Program Kampus Mengajar dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi dan Numerasi Siswa di Sekolah Dasar Inklusi
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Kampus Mengajar Program in improving the literacy and numeracy skills of students in an inclusive elementary school. The research subjects were fifth-grade students at SD Negeri Inklusi Banjang 2 (n = 11) who participated in learning assistance activities conducted by Kampus Mengajar student volunteers. The study employed a quantitative approach using a one-group pretest–posttest design. Data were collected through literacy and numeracy tests administered before and after the intervention. The normality test indicated that the data were normally distributed; therefore, comparative analysis was conducted using a paired sample t-test. The results revealed significant differences between pretest and posttest scores in both literacy (p < 0.001) and numeracy (p = 0.008). These findings indicate that the Kampus Mengajar Program is effective in enhancing students’ literacy and numeracy skills in the inclusive classroom setting.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abdal, N. M. (2024). Peran Program Kampus Mengajar dalam peningkatan kemampuan literasi dan numerasi pada siswa sekolah menengah pertama Kota Makassar. Jurnal MediaTIK, 7(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.59562/mediatik.v7i2.2891
Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
Bakken, R., Næss, K.-A. B., Lemons, C. J., & Hjetland, H. N. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of reading and writing interventions for students with disorders of intellectual development. Education Sciences, 11(10), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100638
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2024). Buku Panduan Program Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 8 Tahun 2024. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia
District School Board of Ontario. (2020). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines. Ontario: Ministry of Education.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). SAGE.
Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 413–430.
Hattie, J. (2015). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hidayah, R., & Utami, R. D. (2024). The implementation of inclusive education programs in reading practice for low-grade slow learners in elementary schools. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 7(3), 3144–3157. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v7i3.9755
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2009). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 70 Tahun 2009 tentang pendidikan inklusif bagi peserta didik yang memiliki kelainan dan memiliki potensi kecerdasan dan/atau bakat istimewa. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Kemendikbudristek. (2021). Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum: Konsep dan Implementasi. Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Program Kampus Mengajar Angkatan 6. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
Mahfiroh, R., & Siswoyo, A. (2024). Pelaksanaan Kampus Mengajar untuk meningkatkan kemampuan literasi dan numerasi di SD Negeri Tanjunggunung. EDUSAINTEK: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains dan Teknologi, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.47668/edusaintek.v11i4.1319
Mustapa, M. (2024). Peningkatan kemampuan literasi dan numerasi peserta didik sekolah dasar melalui Program Kampus Mengajar. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(5), 4043–4050. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i5.8581
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Radzi, N. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2025). Inclusive mathematics pedagogy: A systematic literature review of practices, innovations, and equity in primary schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3).
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Lilliefors, and Anderson–Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.
Sheskin, D. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (5th ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Slavin, R. E. (2020). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (13th ed.). Pearson.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report: Inclusion and Education. UNESCO Publishing.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.